|

#1
Posted 07 April 2012 - 09:28 AM
I am developing a project to replace a motor operated gate valve on a 12 '' Pipeline with a twin seal valve. Does anyone know how can i evaluate the correct valve closing time to avoid the "Fluid HAmmer" Effect?
Thanks for your support
Antonio
#2
Posted 07 April 2012 - 04:48 PM
In my opinion, recommendations on valve closure time are of quite little value, so you should do the calculation to estimate increase of pressure due to water hammer effect.
#3
Posted 08 April 2012 - 03:58 AM
A closure time of 30 to 60 seconds is considered to be more than adequate for the purpose of minimizing a pressure surge wave.
Surge analysis for single-phase can be done using TLNET for liquid and TGNET for gas. The software is supplied by PIPELINE STUDIO and is quite popular for single phase.
For two-phase or multi-phase surge analysis can be done by OLGA from SPT Group. This is one of the best software for pipline modeling but also quite expensive.
A spreadsheet for calculating instantaneous pressure rise due to valve closure and wave velocity can easily be generated. The calculations are quite simple and can give a preliminary estimate for pressure rise or surge pressure due to valve closure without having to do any modeling.
Hoe this helps.
Regards,
Ankur.
#4
Posted 08 April 2012 - 04:12 AM
thanks to both of you for your support.
Just one more question for you Ankur:
For my porpouse a preliminary estimate should be enough and I don't think I need a detailed modelling. You said that a spreadsheet for calculating pressure rise due to valve clousure and wave velocity can be easily generated. Should I generate it referring to links provided by Kkala or should i use other references?
Moreover, Currently a gate valve is installed on the P/L I am talking about. Obviously I already know current closing time. Now I want to replace it with a twin seal valve. Do you think that closing time (to minimize water hammer) is strongly affected?
Thanks in advance
Regards
Antonio
#5
Posted 08 April 2012 - 04:58 AM
I already have a spreadsheet for surge pressure and wave velocity calculation based on instantaneous valve closure using the Joukowski equation. I am contemplating putting it on my blog in "Cheresources". Meanwhile you can try building your own calculation sheet using the following link:
http://help.intellis...papers/6020.pdf
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Ankur.
#6
Posted 08 April 2012 - 05:40 AM
#7
Posted 09 April 2012 - 11:44 PM
Valve closing time is fixed by valve vendors.(say 10 sec.)
We calculate the time for the pressure to reach an unwanted high value at source (say pump) due to sudden valve closing witn the help of process softwares like OLGA or Natasha Plus.
Now we check whether this calculated time (say 15 min ) is sufficient for remove the cause of pressure upset or take some corrective measure to reduce the pressure (overcome the water hammer effect).
But we can back calculate to find the valve closing time once the responce time for corrective measures are known...
I Hope this little bit information will help and invites other process experts to cast some more light on this..
#8
Posted 10 April 2012 - 01:27 AM
Just Crazy,
A piping failure due to water hammer because of which system upsets can develop high piping loads.
When a valve is closed quickly, a dynamic condition sometimes called water hammer can occur. This
phenomenon may be noticed when a home faucet is suddenly closed. When the water lines are loosely
supported, the pipes may rattle or a loud thud is heard. The cause is a pressure wave that can accelerate to the speed of sound in a liquid due to the velocity change. The resulting pressure differential, Δp, (lb/in.2) can be determined by considering the change in linear impulse and fluid momentum
Δp = 0.028 X V X L/t
where V is fluid velocity in the pipe (ft/sec), L is pipe length (ft) and t is time for the valve closure (sec).
The average force, F, (lb) exerted at valve A, is due to this Δp times the pipe flow area, A (in.2).
F = Δp X A = 0.028 X V X L X A/t
References:
1 Design of Piping Systems, Hydraulic Hammer, M.W. Kellogg Company, Wiley, 1956, p. 283.
2 Sofronas, A., Engineering Methods With Applications to Industry, 4th edition, EP Press, pp. 4 - 6.Hope this references will help you more.Good Luck!
Regards
Shivshankar
Attached Files
Edited by Shivshankar, 03 May 2012 - 02:57 AM.
#9
Posted 10 April 2012 - 01:34 AM
Consider the destructive force of water hammer by Heinz P Bloch (Hydrocarbon Processing)
Regards
Shivshankar
#10
Posted 10 April 2012 - 07:37 AM
Just one question more.... is there any simplified method to estimate the change in water hammer effect due to the replacement of a valve with another one? Let me explain it better below.
On a P/L there is a gate valve installed. When it was installed, it was estimated the proper valve closing time to reduce water hammer effect..and it works!
Now the scope of the project is to replace this gate valve with a twin seal one. So i would like to know if current closing time is enough or if it is too high due to a possible increase in water hammer effect. Do you know if a rough estimate considering valve typology is available? Or should i run a detailed analysis with a proper software?
Thanks again
Antonio
#11
Posted 10 April 2012 - 07:38 AM
Just one question more.... is there any simplified method to estimate the change in water hammer effect due to the replacement of a valve with another one? Let me explain it better below.
On a P/L there is a gate valve installed. When it was installed, it was estimated the proper valve closing time to reduce water hammer effect..and it works!
Now the scope of the project is to replace this gate valve with a twin seal one. So i would like to know if current closing time is enough or if it is too high due to a possible increase in water hammer effect. Do you know if a rough estimate considering valve typology is available? Or should i run a detailed analysis with a proper software?
Thanks again
Antonio
#12
Posted 10 April 2012 - 08:41 AM
Please upload your sketch of pipe line and valve installed and calculations document, so the members can help you more effective manner.
Regards
Shivshankar
#13
Posted 10 April 2012 - 09:17 AM
For the evaluation of water hammer in pipeline I used the software "AFT Impulse", and it worked very fine.
#14
Posted 10 April 2012 - 09:33 AM
Stefano I absolutely agree...this is the reason I asked for that. I think that a detailed modelling should be considered.
Thanks for all your contribution.... I think that info provided on this topic are enough for my porpouses... Thanks again
Antonio
#15
Posted 03 May 2012 - 01:32 AM


Similar Topics
![]() Recommended Fluid VelocityStarted by Guest_crn_* , 16 Apr 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
Water Hammer Study: Hysys Dynamics Vs PipenetStarted by Guest_powerox29_* , 07 Apr 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Supercritical Fluid Flowrate - He Tube RuptureStarted by Guest_flarewolf_* , 07 Apr 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() ![]() Steam Condensate Pipeline Water HammerStarted by Guest_kaidlut_* , 06 Sep 2024 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Time Required To Heat Up A Fluid In A VesselStarted by Guest_panoska_* , 24 Jan 2023 |
|
![]() |